[postgis-devel] build issues on the git source of postgis.

mohit kumar mohitkharb at gmail.com
Sat Jun 28 04:19:27 PDT 2014


Hi strk,

On Jun 28, 2014 1:59 PM, "Sandro Santilli" <strk at keybit.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 27, 2014, at 6:08 PM, mohit kumar <mohitkharb at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:16:56PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> > >
> > > "CREATE OPERATOR CLASS spgist_geometry_ops_2d
> > >     DEFAULT FOR TYPE geometry USING SPGIST AS
> > >     STORAGE box2df,"
> >
> > Means what it says, which may point to an important concern: spgist
> > does not support alternate keys as gist does, in fact I recall Oleg and
> > Theodore mentioning an enhancement that would allow spgist to have a
> > compress routine like gist does.
>
> Until that enhancement is ready, it should be fine to keep the operator
> class for the "box2df" type. It should work for functional indexes.
>
> Actually, it would even be better to have it for the "grand unified
> multidimensional bounding range" but we don't have that yet ...
>
> So, let "geometry" go and focus on "box2df". Let us know !
>
I didn't get what to do, the error is still coming.

> Paul, do you have an url to the enhancement proposal ? So to have it in
> on the record in the archive.
>
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20140628/31f0a3d6/attachment.html>


More information about the postgis-devel mailing list