[postgis-devel] upgrading to 2.2.0dev from 2.1

[Paragon Corporation]

Remi,
 
Forgot to say also there is a bug in upgrading from PostGIS 2.1 - 2.2
 
to upgrade you'll need to rename  your postgis-2.1.so file before you can
upgrade a 2.1 db to 2.2
 
see this ticket: http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2382
 
Hope that helps,
Regina

  _____  

From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Rémi Cura
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 2:09 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] upgrading to 2.2.0dev from 2.1



About gdal : a 'sudo ldconfig', and now postgis_full_version is no more
mistaken.

I still have  issue about postgres update script. 

Shall I manually create the update script from 2.1 to 2.2 by fusing the
rt_postgis--2.1--2.2 , postgis .. ??


Thanks,
Cheers,
Rémi-C



2014-03-07 20:01 GMT+01:00 Rémi Cura <remi.cura at gmail.com>:


Hey List,

I downloaded and compiled the latest postgis version (from git).


Everything runs smootlhy (new dependency for bison ?).


Butmake install is not doing what it should.


it creates the 'postgresql/9.3/contrib/postgis-2.2 folder' and file it with
the stuff,

but it doesn't create the files in 'postgresql/9.3/extension'

such as postgis--2.2.0dev.sql, postgis--2.1-2.2.sql, and so.


I created a postgis--2.2.0dev.sql by fusionning postgis.sql, rt_postgis.sql,
spatial_ref_sys.sql,and changed the 'postgis.control' manually
,

so I was able to add to a fresh database 'CREATE EXTENSION postgis VERSION
'2.2.0dev'.


Yet the version of GDAL is still the old one (according to postgis full
version)

In ./configure the correct version of gdal was recognized (1.11)


Am I missing something?


Thanks,

Rémi-C



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20140307/a86e5721/attachment.html>