[postgis-devel] upgrading to 2.2.0dev from 2.1

[Paragon Corporation]

Remi,
 
We've been changing the build/upgrade logic in trunk quite a bit these past
few weeks, though that shouldn't have caused this issue. Also new bison
version should not be required.
 
Do you see files created in your source folder in extensions/postgis/sql or
its not creating those at all?
 
Thanks,
Regina
 

  _____  

From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Rémi Cura
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 2:09 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] upgrading to 2.2.0dev from 2.1



About gdal : a 'sudo ldconfig', and now postgis_full_version is no more
mistaken.

I still have  issue about postgres update script. 

Shall I manually create the update script from 2.1 to 2.2 by fusing the
rt_postgis--2.1--2.2 , postgis .. ??


Thanks,
Cheers,
Rémi-C



2014-03-07 20:01 GMT+01:00 Rémi Cura <remi.cura at gmail.com>:


Hey List,

I downloaded and compiled the latest postgis version (from git).


Everything runs smootlhy (new dependency for bison ?).


Butmake install is not doing what it should.


it creates the 'postgresql/9.3/contrib/postgis-2.2 folder' and file it with
the stuff,

but it doesn't create the files in 'postgresql/9.3/extension'

such as postgis--2.2.0dev.sql, postgis--2.1-2.2.sql, and so.


I created a postgis--2.2.0dev.sql by fusionning postgis.sql, rt_postgis.sql,
spatial_ref_sys.sql,and changed the 'postgis.control' manually
,

so I was able to add to a fresh database 'CREATE EXTENSION postgis VERSION
'2.2.0dev'.


Yet the version of GDAL is still the old one (according to postgis full
version)

In ./configure the correct version of gdal was recognized (1.11)


Am I missing something?


Thanks,

Rémi-C



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20140307/486d134e/attachment.html>