[postgis-devel] Transifex, translation and branches

Paragon Corporation lr at pcorp.us
Fri Oct 17 12:21:35 PDT 2014


Yah we should probably have different branches once we get settled down a
bit.
I don't think we should bother with postgis-2.0 or postgis-2.1. But moving
forward from 2.2 on..

  _____  

From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of George Silva
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 2:35 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Transifex, translation and branches


Also, the main problem that I see, is that when new resources need to be
added to transifex. As I know it, there's not automatic way to letting
transifex know that there are new resources. Probably there's a way to do
it, perhaps flagging a whole directory for it to watch, but I'm not sure.

If there are new resources now (new documentation files), we need to add
them by hand.




On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:30 PM, George Silva <georger.silva at gmail.com>
wrote:


Yes, it's postgis-1 because I first created on my account and it was not
correct. I just changed it to just postgis, not postgis-1.


When you mean outdated, you are saying that we are translating on "old"
files, that the docs were updated, but these files to translated were not?
Is that correct?


Transifex is now automatically updating the files, on branch svn-trunk. Any
changes made to the po files there will be reflected on Transifex.

I think the docs should evolve alongside the newer functions become
available, so no, I would rather have only one version. We can easily have
lots of translation branches and I'm not sure if transifex has support for
merging (git has it, but...)


On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net> wrote:


We found out (with Regina) that Transifex has out-dated
translation template files. As I'm fixing up the Makefile rules
to ensure they get updated when needed, I wonder how to deal with
pushing the new ones on transifex when it comes to branches.

Should we have different transifex projects for different versions ?
Like postgis-2.0, postgis-2.0 and postgis ?

Right now the project on transifex is called "postgis-1" which
sounds due to some false-start from whoever did the initial setup
(George?).

--strk;

  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
  /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html





-- 

George R. C. Silva
SIGMA Consultoria 
----------------------------

http://www.consultoriasigma.com.br/ 




-- 

George R. C. Silva
SIGMA Consultoria 
----------------------------

http://www.consultoriasigma.com.br/ 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20141017/56d50f1a/attachment.html>


More information about the postgis-devel mailing list