[postgis-devel] Loading TIGER data for the geocoder

[Paragon Corporation]

Yah that definitely looks wrong as Steve noted. ca_addr has tons more addr
and edges.
 
It could be my changes to support tiger_2014.  I tested on windows on a
couple of states (not any you listed though) but not on Linux (that was
9.4b2).  But any rate I think its more likely the changes for the tiger
extension than anything else.
 
Did address_standardizer extension install okay.
 
Should just be now a simple
 
CREATE EXTENSION address_standardizer;
 
Thanks,
Regina
 
 

  _____  

From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brian M Hamlin
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2014 1:32 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: [postgis-devel] Loading TIGER data for the geocoder



pg 9.4b3
postgis 2.2 trunk
--

does this look right to you?
(conts of records in each table in tiger_data)







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20141018/3aff159d/attachment.html>