[postgis-devel] Loading TIGER data for the geocoder

[Paragon Corporation]

Brian,
Just noticed something else really odd about your numbers.
 
Your CA And DC numbers are the same -- almost like you loaded DC in CA.  Not
sure how I could have screwed up that badly.
 
Were you trying to parallel load states by chance?  I never finished the
parallel loading logic I was moving toward, so I guess its possible if you
were trying to parallel load data (having two processes handling different
states) something strange might have happened.
 
 
Anyway I'll check on windows and Linux to see if I get same odd behavior.
 
Thanks,
Regina

  _____  

From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paragon
Corporation
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2014 9:51 PM
To: 'PostGIS Development Discussion'
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Loading TIGER data for the geocoder


Yah that definitely looks wrong as Steve noted. ca_addr has tons more addr
and edges.
 
It could be my changes to support tiger_2014.  I tested on windows on a
couple of states (not any you listed though) but not on Linux (that was
9.4b2).  But any rate I think its more likely the changes for the tiger
extension than anything else.
 
Did address_standardizer extension install okay.
 
Should just be now a simple
 
CREATE EXTENSION address_standardizer;
 
Thanks,
Regina
 
 

  _____  

From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brian M Hamlin
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2014 1:32 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: [postgis-devel] Loading TIGER data for the geocoder



pg 9.4b3
postgis 2.2 trunk
--

does this look right to you?
(conts of records in each table in tiger_data)







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20141018/c184b4f4/attachment.html>