[postgis-devel] PostGIS 2.3 release plans
giuseppe.broccolo at 2ndquadrant.it
Sat Jul 30 14:21:42 PDT 2016
2016-07-29 20:29 GMT+02:00 Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us>:
> I've tested this out and looks generally good. I'm ready to commit,
> assuming no one has any issues with that (speak now or forever hold your
> peace), except for one small little thing which I noted in the pull request.
> The work as it stands fails our non-extension uninstall test. To resolve
> this I'd like to rename the operator families to the same name as the
> operator classes so it's consistent with the rest of our code base and also
> so I don't have to muck with our perl uninstall generation script. As I
> mentioned, extension installs don't use this script for uninstall (they
> just use the built-in uninstall plumbing of extension), but our
> pre-extension test uses this.
> I've already done this locally, so just a *Yes *that's okay is all I'm
> looking for or why you are against that.
There is no problem in renaming the OpFamily. Sorry, I've understood that
you already proceeded with this. So yes, please rename it (is the problem
present just for the geography OpFamily?).
Giuseppe Broccolo - 2ndQuadrant Italy
PostgreSQL & PostGIS Training, Services and Support
giuseppe.broccolo at 2ndQuadrant.it | www.2ndQuadrant.it
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the postgis-devel