[postgis-devel] PSC Vote: Github or Gitea (OSGeo Git) or stay on SVN

[Paul Ramsey]

Getting issues out of github is pretty straightforward, particularly
compared to trac,

https://api.github.com/repos/mapserver/mapserver/issues?page=1&per_page=10



P.

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:

> Because there is no point of moving to github unless we move the whole
> thing that means trac too.
> The main benefit of moving to GitHub would be lower maintenance which
> means getting rid of trac and any need for any other git mirror.
>
> To Paul's point I'm more concerned about getting out of github than
> getting into it.
> Though would be interesting to know how much effort they put into the
> migration of all their tickets to github.
>
> Maintaining an OSGeo git and trac does take some maintenance.
>  Is it worth keeping or not is the question in my mind absence of any
> emotional argument.
>
> I would say probably still, but strk you are the one doing most of the
> work keeping things running so I don't know.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On
> Behalf Of Sandro Santilli
> Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 5:13 PM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] PSC Vote: Github or Gitea (OSGeo Git) or stay
> on SVN
>
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:56:47PM -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
>
> > That said my vote is for:
> >
> > Gitea (OSGeo Git) / OSGeo Trac / mirror GitHub - ditch SVN
>
> This motion is a bit confusing, but assuming it is about moving the code
> repository from OSGeo/SVN to OSGeo/GIT my vote is a +1
>
> > It also means tickets don't need moving (though having the seamless
> > patch view would be gone and I'd have to settle for a link to a git
> pull).
> > Until we get tracgit working.
>
> I don't understand this statement: "patch view would be gone".
> If we keep using trac for tickets why would you loose "patch view" ?
>
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20170808/f1c41175/attachment.html>