[postgis-devel] PSC Vote: Change PostGIS library name to drop the minor

[Devrim Gündüz]

Hi,

On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 12:44 -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
> If PostGIS 2.3 worked fine out of the gate with minimal changes to support
> PostgreSQL 10, I wouldn't be so against supporting PostGIS 2.3 on PostgreSQL
> 10.

Sorry for hijacking the thread, but (as we discussed several times before), if
2.3 can be just "compiled" against 10, that would be enough for us. It does not
mean PostGIS 2.3  will support PG 10, it will just make my user base happy,
because they will be able to upgrade.

Regards,
-- 
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20170904/ed12c52c/attachment.sig>