[postgis-devel] Regarding Raster RFC2 edit (r16452)

[Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski]

Hi,

https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/changeset/16452 is performed by Bborie Park
and not me.
Can this be re-addressed? :)

вс, 11 мар. 2018 г. в 10:15, Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io>:

>
> Komzpa I saw you modified RFC2-WellKnownBinaryFormat in r16452 but
> didn't read any thread on postgis-devel reguarding the change.
>
> Those documents are important references and should be changed
> lightly so please revert the change and propose changes on this
> mailing list.
>
> Note that the header of the file contains revision information,
> which you didn't update with your changes.
>
> Specifically your change shifted the last 2 "pixtype" values from
> 9,10 to 10,10 thus leaving a gap in 9:
>
>  +---------------+--------------+-----------------------------------+
>  | pixtype       | 4bits        | 0: 1-bit boolean                  |
>  |               |              | 1: 2-bit unsigned integer         |
>  |               |              | 2: 4-bit unsigned integer         |
>  |               |              | 3: 8-bit signed integer           |
>  |               |              | 4: 8-bit unsigned integer         |
>  |               |              | 5: 16-bit signed integer          |
>  |               |              | 6: 16-bit unsigned signed integer |
>  |               |              | 7: 32-bit signed integer          |
>  |               |              | 8: 32-bit unsigned signed integer |
>  |               |              | 10: 32-bit float                  |
>  |               |              | 11: 64-bit float                  |
>  +---------------+--------------+-----------------------------------+
>
> Is it possible you're updating RFC to match some buggy code ?
>
> --strk;
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20180311/16c1c6cd/attachment.html>