[postgis-devel] Why do we still install liblwgeom includes

[Sandro Santilli]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:39:58PM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> writes:
> 
> > If I recall correctly we started encoding PostGIS version in the
> > liblwgeom filename, something like: liblwgeom-3.0.so.0.0.0
> > That is, *before* shlib version we do encode the postgis part.
> 
> I certainly see the 2.4 in the name of the actual .so, but I also see a
> .a and a .la without the 2.5, and a symlink so without it.
> 
> Is my build/install broken?

Uhm, probably not, but when executables are linked against the
.so their dependency points to a SONAME encoding the PostGIS
version, do them ? 

This is pretty much what we do with the GEOS C++ library.

--strk;

  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
  /\   https://strk.kbt.io/services.html