[postgis-devel] PSC Vote: Move from svn to Git (and by git I mean Gitea)

[Björn Harrtell]

My two cents:

I can see the benefit with migrating to git from svn without considering
issue tracking, especially for active core commiters. Dealing with svn when
I was active was definitely a barrier.

However from the point of view of an inactive committer I would greatly
appreciate a fully featured PR/CI/review UX and I can see it lowering the
barrier for contributions in general.

/Björn

Den mån 21 okt. 2019 19:49Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> skrev:

> I know we had this vote discussion a year or so ago and I hate to look on
> old history.
>
>
>
> So let’s try it again without mouthing (GitHub this time).  Github is too
> dirty of a pond to be our official repo and the thought of the world
> completely running on GitHub is mighty depressing.
>
>
>
> We already have GEOS on gitea and it linked to Trac. I think that’s
> working just fine.  Dan’s issue with gitea last we had this discussion was
> he feared it would be unstable.
>
> I think GEOS on gitea is pretty stable.
>
>
>
> All our private PostGIS repos are already on Gitea.  Our non-travis bots
> are already using Gitea for pulling.
>
>
>
> So with the plan – our ticket tracker still stays on Trac and svn gets
> frozen and all links for Trac repoints to gitea for source repo.
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> Strk and I will work on the relinking and migration.
>
> We’ll still have github / gitlab as git mirrors – and mirroring will be
> easier with a git / git mirroring.
>
>
>
> Comments  including non-PSC folks.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Regina
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20191022/19349872/attachment-0001.html>