[postgis-devel] Stable Branch Naming : Git

[Regina Obe]

+1 only master /stable branches should be in the repo.

Features go in personal repos or are sent as pull requests or patches.

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of rmrodriguez at carto.com
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 1:02 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Stable Branch Naming : Git

I like the idea, I don't care about the naming. GEOS uses just X.Y, gdal uses release/X.Y, Postgres does REL_X_STABLE, so I don't see a standard.


> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 5:48 PM Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
>
> I d like to move that we use a common convention for all stable branches in our fancy new repo, since our trunk is now master:

Regarding this, can we keep only stable branches + master in the fancy new repo? I don't like having development branches in the main repository.



--
Ra l Mar n Rodr guez
carto.com
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel