[postgis-devel] Stable Branch Naming : Git

[Regina Obe]

Forgot about releases (tags) - of course we should have those in repo.

I feel like changing our convention from X.Y.Z  to postgis-X.Y.Z not worth the trouble.
As you can't really go back and rename a tag and having new ones be different from old would just be annoying.  They wouldn't float together.



-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Troxel
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 1:01 PM
To: Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>
Cc: PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Stable Branch Naming : Git

I think stable- is fine.  Stepping back, there should be stable
*branches* to which only fixes and really safe improvementes are made, on which there are release *tags*.

And, as in your example, stable-X.Y would have along it tags
postgis-X.Y.0 and postgis-X.Y.1, etc.



_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel