[postgis-devel] Installation documentation

[Regina Obe]

I wouldn’t bother.  It would be yet another place we’d need to fix if bots move.

 

 

 

From: postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Rindahl
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 12:48 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Installation documentation

 

Should we just add a link to one of the build bots for the output?

 

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 8:48 AM Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us <mailto:lr at pcorp.us> > wrote:

I don’t know what I was thinking when I put those in.  Early on there were much fewer tests and then each release added more and more and raster and sfcgal addition made this exercise completely pointless but out of habit I kept on doing it.

 

I’d chuck them.  Maybe keep the configure output.

 

 

From: postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> ] On Behalf Of Bruce Rindahl
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 11:21 AM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: [postgis-devel] Installation documentation

 

The file doc\installation.xml has about 700 lines of output from make check.  Do we need all that?  In addition, the verbiage is a few years old (PostgresQL-12dev) and depending on the build environment  you will get different messages even with a clean build.

_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org> 
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20210827/c5558ae4/attachment.html>