[postgis-devel] Installation documentation

[Bruce Rindahl]

Should we just add a link to one of the build bots for the output?

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 8:48 AM Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:

> I don’t know what I was thinking when I put those in.  Early on there were
> much fewer tests and then each release added more and more and raster and
> sfcgal addition made this exercise completely pointless but out of habit I
> kept on doing it.
>
>
>
> I’d chuck them.  Maybe keep the configure output.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Bruce Rindahl
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 25, 2021 11:21 AM
> *To:* PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Subject:* [postgis-devel] Installation documentation
>
>
>
> The file doc\installation.xml has about 700 lines of output from make
> check.  Do we need all that?  In addition, the verbiage is a few years old
> (PostgresQL-12dev) and depending on the build environment  you will get
> different messages even with a clean build.
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20210827/f13965bb/attachment.html>