[postgis-devel] PSC Vote: Approve RFC-5 Core Contributor Guidelines

[Regina Obe]

Sounds good to me.  I left it as is cause I wasn't sure if we wanted anyone
but PSC to be creating feature branches.
I guess it makes sense for any core team member to do so but then I worried
it could get out of hand.  Still not all our bots test all branches.

Though the fact that Winnie / Debbie wouldn't test feature branches is
something I should fix.  Though would be better to fix the pull request bit.

If all bots tested pull requests then we really wouldn't need feature
branches at all.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On
> Behalf Of Sandro Santilli
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 5:57 AM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion <postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] PSC Vote: Approve RFC-5 Core Contributor
> Guidelines
> 
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 05:04:23PM -0500, Regina Obe wrote:
> > I've made a number of changes to
> >
> > https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/DevWikiComitGuidelines
> 
> Another thing: about "feature branches" we could maybe define a policy
> because right now pushing "feature branches"
> to official repository is the ONLY way to have ALL bots test the change,
which
> I've been using for the spatial-ref-sys-view branch, for instance.
> 
> We could maybe prefix those feature branches with a tag like:
> 
>     testing/xxxxx
> 
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel