PostgreSQL 18beta1 should we release a PostGIS 3.5.3

[lr at pcorp.us]

Yah that's fine.  That's why I was proposing an alpha for 3.6.0, cause alpha means we can still add new features.  But it provides a tagged version that packagers can work against.  
They won't be packaging 3.6 unless if there is a tagged version of it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loïc Bartoletti <loic.bartoletti at oslandia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 4:13 AM
> To: lr at pcorp.us
> Cc: postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 18beta1 should we release a PostGIS 3.5.3
> 
> OK for PostGIS 3.5.3.
> 
> About PostGIS 3.6.0 ok for an alpha version.
> But, from SFCGAL we would like to add algorithms from 2.1.0 :
> 
> - 3D Alpha Wrapping (GH-801 in progress)
> - CDT Simplification (not yet pushed, but ready)
> 
> And we have to fix 3D Buffer documentation.
> 
> And maybe:
> 
> - Fix/Add M support
> - Fix ST_NumGeometries/ST_NumPatches/ST_PatchN for PolyhedralSurface /
> 	TIN [1]
> 
> Loïc,
> 
> [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/2025-April/030516.html
> 
> On 12/05/2025 14:00, lr at pcorp.us wrote:
> >PostgreSQL 18beta1 came out recently and unfortunately the latest
> >release PostGIS 3.5.2 doesn't work with it.
> >
> >I think our stable-3.5 is patched to work with PostgreSQL 18beta1.
> >Should we release a 3.5.3 soon, so PostgreSQL 18beta testers have a
> >tagged release to work with?
> >
> >I'm thinking of a PostGIS 3.5.3 and as PostGIS 3.6.0alpha1
> >
> >Thoughts,
> >Regina
> >