[postgis-tickets] [PostGIS] #3605: why do we have both _st_countagg_finalfn and __st_countagg_finalfn
PostGIS
trac at osgeo.org
Sun Jul 31 17:46:10 PDT 2016
#3605: why do we have both _st_countagg_finalfn and __st_countagg_finalfn
---------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: robe | Owner: dustymugs
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: medium | Milestone: PostGIS 2.3.0
Component: raster | Version: 2.2.x
Resolution: | Keywords:
---------------------+---------------------------
Description changed by robe:
Old description:
> In going thru the code, I noticed for raster we have
>
> _st_countagg_finalfn and __st_countagg_finalfn
>
> Why do we have one with _ and with __ .I first thought I made a mistake
> in my mass schema qualify calls work and introduced another underscore by
> accident, but I see the same thing in PostGIS 2.2 code.
New description:
In going thru the code, I noticed for raster we have
{{{
_st_countagg_finalfn and __st_countagg_finalfn
}}}
Why do we have one with _ and with __ .I first thought I made a mistake
in my mass schema qualify calls work and introduced another underscore by
accident, but I see the same thing in PostGIS 2.2 code.
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/3605#comment:1>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/>
The PostGIS Trac is used for bug, enhancement & task tracking, a user and developer wiki, and a view into the subversion code repository of PostGIS project.
More information about the postgis-tickets
mailing list