[postgis-users] CVS with PG 7.2?
Tyler Mitchell
TMitchell at lignum.com
Tue Apr 2 08:20:00 PST 2002
Just a side question on this - what are the major advantages that people
see with getting postgis to PG 7.2?
Bernhard Reiter
<bernhard at intevation.de> To: postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
Sent by: cc:
postgis-users-admin at postgis.refra Fax to:
ctions.net Subject: Re: [postgis-users] CVS with PG 7.2?
04/02/2002 03:17 AM
Please respond to postgis-users
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 12:23:01PM -0800, raanders at acm.org wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
> > No, I think you read the opposite. Doing the changes to support 7.2 is
> > not hard, just time consuming. If anyone wants to fund it, we'd be
happy
> > to prioritize that work.
>
> Paul. Could you give an estimate of cost? And would you be interested
in
> doing it as a 'donations' project? I for one can't afford the whole
> shebang but could contribute some towards the final objective. There
> could be others willing and able to contribute to the greater good.
We from Intevation are also willing to contribute a fraction of the costs.
Let's say roughly about 1/4 of the amount needed for the CVS version.
We'll have to find the other 3/4 as long as it still makes sense. :)
--
Professional Service for Free Software (intevation.net)
The FreeGIS Project (freegis.org)
Association for a Free Informational Infrastructure (ffii.org)
FSF Europe (fsfeurope.org)
(See attached file: atto4364.dat)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: atto4364.dat
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20020402/10e3f1c6/attachment.obj>
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list