[postgis-users] Selecting geocoded postal codes within a given distance ( miles for example )
Hugh W. O'Brien
hugho at intelis.com
Tue Dec 17 09:14:53 PST 2002
Unfortunately, I must support all US postal codes so all of continental
US and it's territories. I might also have to include support for
Canada in the future.
-- Hugh W. O'Brien
Paul Ramsey wrote:
> In the curious world of UTM (and planar systems in general), the
> answer depends on where you are :) Planar systems are local
> transforms which make a range of spherical lat/lon coordinates into a
> planar approximation. Because the world in spherical, it is very hard
> to have a planar projection which is covers a very large area, is true
> to shape, and is true to distance. So different parameterizatios of
> planar projections are used for different locations. If you are on the
> west coast of North America, then UTM10 (EPSG 26910) would be a good
> UTM projection. But if you are in Texas, then a different projection
> would be best.
>
> Question number one when picking a planar projection is "how spatially
> big is your dataset?" Ie, what are its bounds in lat/lon?
>
> Paul
>
> Hugh W. O'Brien wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the reply Paul. I had come to the conclusion that I had
>> those 2 choice but wasn't sure which one was more difficult. Thanks
>> for pointing out which one is easier to implement.
>>
>> Now for a followup question?
>>
>> What's the best way to convert my geocoded postal codes to UTM?
>>
>> What would be the appropriate SRID of my new data set if I chose UTM
>> as my new rectangular cooridinate set?
>>
>
> __
> /
> | Paul Ramsey
> | Refractions Research
> | Email: pramsey at refractions.net
> | Phone: (250) 885-0632
> \_
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list