[postgis-users] Insert performance issues
Charlton Purvis
cpurvis at asg.sc.edu
Tue Oct 28 07:49:48 PST 2003
Cool. One more thing, you might want to consider Dave's advice in
response to an earlier email of mine dated 10/25/2003 having to do w/
slow addgeomoetrycolumn execution. Once I removed it, things flew.
[from Dave]
If you want you can remove that portion from AddGeometryColumns() - just
stick null in instead.
The only part that depends on those column being present is the advanced
STATS package (makefile USE_STATS=1).
Charlton
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerry Creager N5JXS [mailto:gerry.creager at tamu.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:39 AM
> To: PostGIS Users Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Insert performance issues
>
> Excellent idea. Thanks for the paradigm shift. The use of hourly, or
> daily, tables is one thing I'd briefly considered but not put
sufficient
> time into. You've just crystallized its use.
>
> I can do a much shorter, 48 hour history and dump a day's worth of
data
> into the archive db. That'd give me real fast queries and allow me to
> keep solely unique historic data (archival info _is_ important).
>
> We're branching into models, especially EPA-based ozone mapping and
> modelling, and looking at sea-breeze influence. Hence, we're going to
> have to become more efficient.
>
> Thanks!
> gerry
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list