[postgis-users] Improving Performance
Wood Brent
pcreso at pcreso.com
Thu Feb 19 09:51:42 PST 2004
--- Tyler Mitchell <TMitchell at lignum.com> wrote:
> > I had a little idea like this in December - a 'lean' version of postgis,
>
> > that only supports 2D geometries (and points) and where all geometries
> > are assumed to have the same projection.
>
> Interesting idea. In my case, almost all my data is in UTM. Could the
> geometries then just be INTEGER pairs and not FLOATS?>
Arrgh.... I like the idea of a lite version, but all my data is decimal
degrees,
so integers wouldn't help much :-) Which projection would be the only one
supported?
Would a poll to identify the 80/20 of core functionality be worth running
before starting on a lite version?
I can see the situation arising where many PostGIS users support a lite
version, but use is varied enough that everyone wants a different subset of
functionality.
Cheers,
Brent Wood
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list