[postgis-users] MySQL-PostGIS performance comparison
Paul DuBois
paul at kitebird.com
Fri Mar 5 08:22:52 PST 2004
> Some days ago I wrote a mail to this list about performance of some spatial
> querys.
> These querys are made from a PlugIn of JUMP (Java Unified Mapping Platform)
> which we are developing.
>
> We have developed a similar plugin to access MySQL. SQL Code (built
> dynamically from FeatureCollection schema) is similar, because PostGIS and
> MySQL are implementations of OGC Standars.
>
> Ive noticed that MySQL performance for querys is about 10:1 compare to the
> same querys with PostGIS. My two tables (MySQL and Postgis) have spatial
> indexes, and PostGIS's table has been vacuum).
Do you mean MySQL is 10 times faster, or 10 times slower?
> Are this results normal? Do you want original data to make some performance
> tests?
> Alse Ive read in Internet that MySQL is very fast (even more fast than
> Oracle) because it isn't a transactional DB -people say it hasnt integrity).
> Has Postgre this integrity in transactional environments?
> I dont want to disturb you. I only want to help you to improve Postgis.
MySQL has both non-transactional and transactional tables. However,
currently the spatial data types are supported only for the MyISAM
storage engine, which handles non-transactional tables.
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list