[postgis-users] View area

Sean M. Montague smontague at ATSDenver.com
Wed Feb 16 09:00:45 PST 2005


I found a web site that said the version shipped with postgreSQL 8.0
installer had problems and linked to a windows installer for PostGIS
0.9.1.  So I reloaded it, which is the version below.  I did get an
improvement, I think, but still have problems with intersection.  I
actually got polygons, but they don't resemble what actually exists.
Looks like they've been generalized into triangles, and some points were
still returned.

POSTGIS="0.9.1" GEOS="2.1.1" PROJ="Rel. 4.4.9, 29 Oct 2004" USE_STATS
DBPROC="0.0.1" RELPROC="0.0.1"


-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of
strk at refractions.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 1:23 AM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] View area

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:42:35PM -0700, Sean M. Montague wrote:
> I'm using postgreSQL 8.0.1 win32 version and whichever postGIS comes
> with it, 0.9.1 I think.  My input geometries are multi-part polygons
> imported from a shape file.  Every state is its own multi-part poly,
> regardless of the number of individual polys, at least as a shape
file,
> not sure how postGIS handles this.  I'm also not sure what GEOS I'm
> using.  Is this an add-on installed separately?

If intersection is working it's probably installed by the package
you got. Check output of SELECT postgis_full_version() to find
out the version.

--strk;

> 
> --Sean
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of
> strk at refractions.net
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 1:33 PM
> To: PostGIS Users Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-users] View area
> 
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 12:37:25PM -0700, Sean M. Montague wrote:
> > I've investigated what the relationship of the points is to the
> original
> > poly layer, and they are not the vertices, at least not all of them.
> > The original layer is the coast of south east Alaska with about 25
> > islands.  The points may be some of the vertices perhaps, they do
lie
> on
> > the coasts.  The summary() returns 556 "Object 0 is a POINT()" and 1
> > "Object 0 is a LINESTRING() with 2 points".  The up side is, they at
> > least lie within my bounding box.
> 
> It sounds as a bug to me. Which GEOS version are you using ?
> What types are input geometries ?
> Which postgis version ? postgresql ?
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users



More information about the postgis-users mailing list