[postgis-users] Ready for 1.0.0 ?

[strk at refractions.net]

On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:51:16AM -0300, Fernão Lopes wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I have the 0.9.1 installed and working. I'm using Postgresql 8.0.1 in
> a debian with 2.6.8 686 kernel.
> 
> I've tried to install the 1.0 RC3, but experienced some problems.
> I can read old postgis data and publish it with mapserver; but I can't
> enable new databases using the lwpostgis. I received the following
> error:
> 
> DETAIL:  Creating a shell type definition.
> psql:lwpostgis.sql:36: ERROR:  could not load library
> "/usr/local/pgsql/lib/liblwgeom.so.1.0":
> /usr/local/pgsql/lib/liblwgeom.so.1.0: undefined symbol:
> _ZN4geos11Polygonizer11getPolygonsEv
> 
> The file is there.
> 
> This message is received when I installed it in a system that already
> had postgis 0.91 installed AND in a new one, with a postgresql 8.0.1
> with no data, from the scratch.
> 
> Any ideas?

It seems you're building with GEOS support but w/out GEOS installed.
Can this be the case ? What is USE_GEOS set to in Makefile.config ?
Do you have an USE_GEOS environmental variable set ?

--strk;

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Fernão Lopes
> 
> 
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:00:07 +0100, Markus Schaber <schabi at logix-tt.com> wrote:
> > Hi, Mark,
> > 
> > Mark Cave-Ayland schrieb:
> > 
> > >>BTW, I successfully compiled postgis using JAVAC="jikes-sun
> > >>-target 1.1"  for java 1.1 compatibility. :-)
> > >
> > > Yes, the PostGIS JDBC driver compiles fine for me with -target 1.1 under the
> > > Sun JDK. I think we should make this the default :)
> > 
> > I think this is a good idea.
> > 
> > However, I'm afraid not all of the java compilers around do support
> > -target, so I'm hesitating to put it in the makefile as default, as this
> > could annoy Alex Bodnaru :-)
> > 
> > >>You can use "make alltests" to run them, they test both
> > >>client and some server functionality, but you will have to
> > >>set up the database connection info via environment or
> > >>makefile. I think this will be the first Windows tests for
> > >>postgis jdbc :-)
> > > The tests appear to run successfully here for me. I just wanted to check
> > > with you as there seem to be multiple entries along the lines of "Finished,
> > > 0 tests failed" as opposed to a single grand total at the end. I'll email
> > > the JDBC results to you separately as they are quite long, but it's looking
> > > promising :)
> > 
> > Yes. The reason for this is that two of the test applications are only
> > slightly adopted versions of Pauls original tests, while the others were
> > derived from our in-house work. Another problem was that, originally,
> > some of the test cases were "allowed" to fail against older PostGIS
> > versions, needing manual re-checking of the output. It was not until
> > recently that I added a check for the postgis version so the test
> > programs know which tests to run, and which are allowed to fail.
> > 
> > On my todo list for those tests is to have them output only a small
> > summary, and write everything else into a test log file. Another idea
> > may be using junit or another test framework, but I don't like the idea
> > of adding another dependency.
> > 
> > Markus
> > --
> > Markus Schaber | Dipl. Informatiker | Software Development GIS
> > 
> > Fight against software patents in EU! http://ffii.org/
> >                                       http://nosoftwarepatents.org/
> > _______________________________________________
> > postgis-users mailing list
> > postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users