[postgis-users] docbook requirement

[Jean David TECHER]

Sandro U know..As it is said in French: 'Bof ...Allez on passe à la suite...!!!'
and in English 'Let's go !!!"


I don't really mind about PostGIS Doc since
on Windows I've already xsltrpoc, docbook and pdflatex, pdfxmltex (too)
and db2latex...But I only ask for Docbook for postgis-users who wants to install it...Nevermind

But U're right...Doc is not really important ... :--)
---------------------------------------------------------------
TECHER Jean David
01MAP
e-mail: david at 01map.net
Tél: 04 67 45 60 27
Entreprise: http://www.01map.net
Perso: http://techer.pascal.free.fr/postgis/
---------------------------------------------------------------
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: strk at refractions.net 
  To: PostGIS Users Discussion 
  Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 10:51 AM
  Subject: [postgis-users] docbook requirement


  On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:32:35AM +0200, Jean David TECHER wrote:
  > however it's better to ask postgis-users...fo doc
  > 
  > perhaps better to prevent from to do the doc from general makefile
  > even if as U said postgis came with pre-build documentation
  > 
  > For me, better to see if docbook and xsltproc is installed
  > by configure or user as said gerald enable from configure the option '--with--doc'
  > 
  > what do U think??

  Sounds fair, but again, I wouldn't mind IFF current release
  process works. If we want to help testing it we might add
  the produced documentation in CVS as we did for generated
  parser code.

  --strk;
  _______________________________________________
  postgis-users mailing list
  postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
  http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20050513/c1f585dc/attachment.html>