[postgis-users] [jdbc][datasource] use postgis through JDBC inSpring

[Nicolas Delsaux]

On 10/18/06, Norman Barker <nbarker at ittvis.com> wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> I wrote a tutorial on doing this with PostGIS and EJB3 annotations (within JBoss) here - http://postgis.refractions.net/support/wiki/index.php?SpatialEJB3

I've already looked at this document, and I'll go deeper in.
>
> I know it sounds as if I am reinventing GeoTools / GeoNetwork, I am not really I just need clustering, and annotations make life very easy (if a little harder to debug / follow!) and also the catalog needs to be LGPL if I am to use it.

So, do you say that geotools, although not fully complying your needs,
provides such a datasource for postgis ?
>
> Let me know if you need any help.
>
> Norman
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net [mailto:postgis-users-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Nicolas Delsaux
> Sent: 18 October 2006 14:54
> To: PostGIS Users Discussion
> Subject: [postgis-users] [jdbc][datasource] use postgis through JDBC inSpring
>
> Hi, is there anywhere a tutorial on PostGIS integration in JEE
> environments using containers like Spring or, even simpler,
> datasources instead of connections ?
> I suspect geotools provides a layer for connection, but will it remove
> the need for me to addDataTypes manually ?
>
> --
> Nicolas Delsaux
> N'imprimez ce mail que si vous ne savez pas le lire sur l'écran : les
> électrons se recyclent bien, le papier, beaucoup moins bien.
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>


-- 
Nicolas Delsaux
N'imprimez ce mail que si vous ne savez pas le lire sur l'écran : les
électrons se recyclent bien, le papier, beaucoup moins bien.