[postgis-users] PostGIS 2.0 Wishlist
Paul Ramsey
pramsey at refractions.net
Wed May 9 09:09:40 PDT 2007
You are correct, the request was for geodetic support, not geocentric
support, and that support requires:
- Operations on a spher(oid)
- Indexes for a spher(oid)
Neither of which are currently available (except for distance_sphere and
distance_spheriod). It's fiddly stuff, and implies a fair amount of
duplication with the existing cartesian support, that is, touching a lot
of the code base, so it's not a small project.
P
ValiSystem wrote:
> But i would not be surprise that creating another implementation of
> basic geos algorithms would make it possible, it would be interesting to
> know how complex it would be, and if it could make all the others geos
> function work auto-magically (having to fix the whole geos code would be
> sad, long and painfull).
>
> This is for the geometric operations. There is also a problem with the
> RTree BBoxes, since the RTree relies on distance, and distance depends
> of calculation formulas, for the same data, a geodetic RTree would not
> be the same as the RTrees we currently use. Since it could not be
> simple as greater than a lower than operations on BBoxes corners, i
> don't know what would be the actual runtime cost, but i'm not optimistic.
>
> But i'm not an expert, i'm just curious to see what kind of problems it
> raises. This is a great feature and i'd like to see it, but i would not
> ask for something that implies too much work.
--
Paul Ramsey
Refractions Research
http://www.refractions.net
pramsey at refractions.net
Phone: 250-383-3022
Cell: 250-885-0632
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list