[postgis-users] st_union says geometries have different srids

[Paul Ramsey]

NP, the architecture is a red herring, since the reporter saw the
problem in 64-bit land and I have now seen it on two different 32-bit
compilations (OS/X (thanks for the explanation!) and Linux)

P.

On 3/17/08, William Kyngesburye <woklist at kyngchaos.com> wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 12:10 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
>  >> Nope not yet; I'm still in the process of setting up various build
>  >> environments. Does OS X support "uname -a" to show exactly what
>  >> architecture
>  >> you are running on?
>  >
>  > Heron:~ pramsey$ uname -a
>  > Darwin Heron.local 9.2.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.2.0: Tue Feb  5
>  > 16:13:22 PST 2008; root:xnu-1228.3.13~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
>  >
>  > Nothing definitive that I can see. I'm putting together a centos
>  > virtual box now to see if the test fails there too.
>  >
>
> OSX 10.5 is both 32bit and 64bit, but it also depends on the processor
>  - PPCs are all 64bit capable, but can run in 32bit mode (all previous
>  OSX and Classic versions do this), core duos on the first Intel models
>  are 32bit, core 2 duos are 64bit.  The 10.5 system includes all of
>  these in one fat binary.
>
>  BUT, a default compile on 10.5 builds 32bit binaries, so unless you
>  explicitly said to build 64bit, your Postgres and PostGIS are 32bit.
>
>  Or, are you using my binaries?  Those include 64bit and 32bit
>  binaries, and will run 64bit when possible.
>
>
>  I have a Postgres 8.2 x86_64 for OSX 10.5 on my Postgres page with
>  matching PostGIS 1.3.2, if you want to test it.  I've upgraded my 10.5
>  Mac to PG 8.3 already and don't have a spare to install 8.2.
>
>  >>
>
>  -----
>  William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com>
>  http://www.kyngchaos.com/
>
>  "Oh, look, I seem to have fallen down a deep, dark hole.  Now what
>  does that remind me of?  Ah, yes - life."
>
>  - Marvin
>
>
>