[postgis-users] shp2pgsql with DBF >= 2 GB?

Aren Cambre aren at arencambre.com
Sat Jan 1 05:33:33 PST 2011


It was raised there 4.5 years ago:
http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463.

Might be nice if PostGIS maintainers could "bug" that developer about
resolution?

The proposed local patch is changing int to long on three variables. While
that may not be graceful, could it work as a temporary workaround?

<http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463>Aren

On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland <
mark.cave-ayland at siriusit.co.uk> wrote:

> On 01/01/11 06:46, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
>  No workarounds. I thought there was a braindead patch on that ticket
>> already, but it's not a patch I feel good enough to apply as a
>> permanent fix.
>>
>> P.
>>
>
> Yeah. Also since we've recently resynced with upstream shapelib, I'd much
> rather the issue is raised/fixed there and then we can just resync once
> again.
>
>
> ATB,
>
> Mark.
>
> --
> Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect
> PostgreSQL - PostGIS
> Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
> http://www.siriusit.co.uk
> t: +44 870 608 0063
>
> Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20110101/cc9b494a/attachment.html>


More information about the postgis-users mailing list