[postgis-users] Postgis 2.1.0 poor performance vs Postgis 2.0.3

Moen, Paul T. pmoen at nd.gov
Tue Dec 10 09:00:57 PST 2013


Steve,

That did the trick in a big way.  I will make ANALYZE a step in my upgrade
process from now on.

My new query after the ANALYZE.

--select 
"flow_type","feat_type",encode(ST_AsBinary(ST_Force2D("the_geom"),'NDR'),'h
ex') as geom,"gid" from basemap.water24k_line where the_geom &&
ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((1564746.75408708
903581.471987315,1564746.75408708 938518.971987315,1599744.49115605
938518.971987315,1599744.49115605 903581.471987315,1564746.75408708
903581.471987315))',2266);
Total query runtime: 569 ms.
344 rows retrieved.


Thank you very much,

Paul

On 12/10/13, 10:02 AM, "Stephen Woodbridge" <woodbri at swoodbridge.com>
wrote:

>Paul,
>
>Did you ANALYZE the new database after you upgraded it to 2.1.0?
>Try that and rerun your query and see if that helps.
>
>-Steve
>
>On 12/10/2013 10:46 AM, Moen, Paul T. wrote:
>> I have a table of multilines that the query below slows down
>> considerably after upgrading to postgis 2.1.0.
>>
>> I am running the following Postgis.
>> "POSTGIS="2.0.3 r11128" GEOS="3.4.2-CAPI-1.8.2 r3921" PROJ="Rel. 4.8.0,
>> 6 March 2012" GDAL="GDAL 1.10.1, released 2013/08/26" LIBXML="2.7.3"
>> LIBJSON="UNKNOWN" TOPOLOGY RASTER"
>> Below is a query that is created by Mapserver 6.0.3 that I am running in
>> pgAdmin.
>> -- Executing query:
>> select
>> 
>>"flow_type","feat_type",encode(ST_AsBinary(ST_Force_2D("the_geom"),'NDR')
>>,'hex')
>> as geom,"gid" from basemap.water24k_line where the_geom &&
>> ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((1564746.75408708
>> 903581.471987315,1564746.75408708 938518.971987315,1599744.49115605
>> 938518.971987315,1599744.49115605 903581.471987315,1564746.75408708
>> 903581.471987315))',2266)
>> Total query runtime: 569 ms.
>> 344 rows retrieved.
>>
>> After upgrading to Postgis 2.1.0,
>> "POSTGIS="2.1.0 r11822" GEOS="3.4.2-CAPI-1.8.2 r3921" PROJ="Rel. 4.8.0,
>> 6 March 2012" GDAL="GDAL 1.10.1, released 2013/08/26" LIBXML="2.7.3"
>> LIBJSON="UNKNOWN" TOPOLOGY RASTER"
>> the same query takes over 10 times the time.
>>
>> -- Executing query:
>> select
>> 
>>"flow_type","feat_type",encode(ST_AsBinary(ST_Force_2D("the_geom"),'NDR')
>>,'hex')
>> as geom,"gid" from basemap.water24k_line where the_geom &&
>> ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((1564746.75408708
>> 903581.471987315,1564746.75408708 938518.971987315,1599744.49115605
>> 938518.971987315,1599744.49115605 903581.471987315,1564746.75408708
>> 903581.471987315))',2266);
>> --select postgis_full_version();
>> --alter extension postgis_topology update to '2.1.0';
>> WARNING:  ST_Force_2d signature was deprecated in 2.1.0. Please use
>> ST_Force2D
>> CONTEXT:  SQL function "st_force_2d" during startup
>> Total query runtime: 6202 ms.
>> 344 rows retrieved.
>>
>> Changing ST_Force_2D to ST_Force2D helped quite a bit, but it is still
>> twice as slow as Postgis 2.0.3.
>>
>> -- Executing query:
>> select
>> 
>>"flow_type","feat_type",encode(ST_AsBinary(ST_Force2D("the_geom"),'NDR'),
>>'hex')
>> as geom,"gid" from basemap.water24k_line where the_geom &&
>> ST_GeomFromText('POLYGON((1564746.75408708
>> 903581.471987315,1564746.75408708 938518.971987315,1599744.49115605
>> 938518.971987315,1599744.49115605 903581.471987315,1564746.75408708
>> 903581.471987315))',2266);
>> --select postgis_full_version();
>> --alter extension postgis_topology update to '2.1.0';
>> Total query runtime: 1029 ms.
>> 344 rows retrieved.
>>
>> Is performance hit expected?
>>
>> Thanks for any insight,
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-users mailing list
>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>postgis-users mailing list
>postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users



More information about the postgis-users mailing list