[postgis-users] Is it worth to load background raster into postgis?

[Stephen V. Mather]

By reputation, qgis-mapserver is probably the easiest.  GeoServer isn't so bad either and comes bundled with GeoWebCache which takes care of the latency and rendering speed issues endemic to WMS.  I hear UMN Mapserver isn't too bad these days either, but I may never forgive it for the 160 hrs I lost trying to compile it on Mac OS X in 2004 :).  Long live software grudges... .

Best,
Steve

  Stephen V. Mather
GIS Manager
(216) 635-3243 (Work)
clevelandmetroparks.com


________________________________________
From: postgis-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [postgis-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] on behalf of Paolo Cavallini [cavallini at faunalia.it]
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 1:47 AM
To: postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] Is it worth to load background raster into postgis?

Il 08/02/2013 20:27, Pietro Rossin ha scritto:
> We don't have a WMS server yet, any suggestion for a "not too difficult to configure"
> solution?

OT here, but cetainly the easiest is
aptitude install qgis-mapserver
All the best.

--
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users