[postgis-users] Querying Multiple Rasters

Bborie Park dustymugs at gmail.com
Tue Jul 30 10:01:43 PDT 2013


That should work if you're querying against the subparent instead of the
parent. You'll need to test though...

-bborie


On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Jayson Gallardo <jaysontrades at gmail.com>wrote:

> What if I create subparents for each state, and set an extent constraint
> on each subparent? Would that help? Or would the query still check the
> constraint for each child of each subparent?
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Bborie Park <dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 3m NED data doesn't exist for the continental US (at least from USGS).
>> But if you were to do so, you could consider a different scheme...
>>
>> 1. All NED files are stored as out-db rasters
>> 2. Each table is for one state, though in some situations you may want
>> more than one table per state (e.g. Texas, California).
>>
>> That should help you keep the # of partitions to a minimum and reduce the
>> size of each partition.
>>
>> -bborie
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jayson Gallardo <jaysontrades at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I was reading the page on partitioning, and the very last line says* "**Partitioning
>>> using these techniques will work well with up to perhaps a hundred
>>> partitions; don't try to use many thousands of partitions." *I'm
>>> already up to ~400 tables in this partitioning scheme just for Arkansas and
>>> Iowa... Is this a good idea? Would there be a better way to do the entire
>>> continental US?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Bborie Park <dustymugs at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The quick and dirty approach is to have a query before that query that
>>>> transforms the WKT.
>>>>
>>>> Something like "SELECT ST_AsEWKT(ST_Transform(...))"
>>>>
>>>> -bborie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Jayson Gallardo <
>>>> jaysontrades at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I suppose I could do that in my script. How should I go about that? My
>>>>> process is as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - User selects area of interest on a map (openlayers)
>>>>>    - User clicks submit, and python script is called with the WKT
>>>>>    passed as an argument
>>>>>    - Python script queries the database, which then outputs the raster
>>>>>    - Raster is processed through a library
>>>>>    - Processed raster is displayed as an overlay on the map
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Bborie Park <dustymugs at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you able to transform the wkt before passing it to the sql?
>>>>>> Partitioning only works on constant values, not values that need
>>>>>> processing, e.g. ST_Transform(ST_GeomFromText(\'%s\',%i),%i)).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -bborie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Jayson Gallardo <
>>>>>> jaysontrades at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's the constraints:
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT dem_elevation_n33w092_pkey PRIMARY KEY (rid ),
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT enforce_height_rast CHECK (st_height(rast) = 100),
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT enforce_max_extent_rast CHECK
>>>>>>> (st_coveredby(st_convexhull(rast), '*...truncated...*'::geometry)),
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT enforce_num_bands_rast CHECK (st_numbands(rast) = 1),
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT enforce_out_db_rast CHECK
>>>>>>> (_raster_constraint_out_db(rast) = '{f}'::boolean[]),
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT enforce_pixel_types_rast CHECK
>>>>>>> (_raster_constraint_pixel_types(rast) = '{32BF}'::text[]),
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT enforce_same_alignment_rast CHECK
>>>>>>> (st_samealignment(rast, '*...truncated...*'::raster)),
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT enforce_scalex_rast CHECK
>>>>>>> (st_scalex(rast)::numeric(16,10) = 0.000092592592593::numeric(16,10)),
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT enforce_scaley_rast CHECK
>>>>>>> (st_scaley(rast)::numeric(16,10) = (-0.000092592592593)::numeric(16,10)),
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT enforce_srid_rast CHECK (st_srid(rast) = 4269),
>>>>>>>   CONSTRAINT enforce_width_rast CHECK (st_width(rast) = 100)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and my python script:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wkt = sys.argv[1]  # Polygon shape in WKT format
>>>>>>> raster_type = 'GTiff'
>>>>>>> table_name = 'dem_elevation'
>>>>>>> map_srs = 900913
>>>>>>> table_srs = 4269
>>>>>>> sql_text = 'SELECT ST_AsGDALRaster(ST_CLIP(ST_Union(rast),
>>>>>>> ST_GeomFromText(\'%s\',%i)),\'%s\') FROM "%s" WHERE
>>>>>>> ST_Intersects(rast, ST_Transform(ST_GeomFromText(\'%s\',%i),%i))' %
>>>>>>> (wkt, map_srs, raster_type, table_name, wkt, map_srs, table_srs)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Bborie Park <dustymugs at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jayson,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you share one of the queries? Also, what check constraints are
>>>>>>>> you using?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -bborie
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Jayson Gallardo <
>>>>>>>> jaysontrades at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, I used Explain on my SELECT statement, and whether
>>>>>>>>> constraint_exclusion is on or off, it seems to spit out the same number of
>>>>>>>>> rows in the query plan. Is there something I need to do for my table
>>>>>>>>> constraints so that it doesn't do a check on every table I have loaded?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Jayson Gallardo <
>>>>>>>>> jaysontrades at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Quick follow up question to my situation... I recently loaded 3m
>>>>>>>>>> resolution NED for Iowa. I have them loaded to one table per source tile,
>>>>>>>>>> and have them inheriting from the parent table that the Arkansas NED is
>>>>>>>>>> inheriting from. Ever since, however, my database seems to be running
>>>>>>>>>> pretty slow. I've run a full vacuum on the data, and there are constraints
>>>>>>>>>> on each table.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How can I be sure that when I query the parent database that it's
>>>>>>>>>> not querying every single table?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Bborie Park <dustymugs at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm just glad to help. Feel free to post your experience,
>>>>>>>>>>> feedback, issues and/or wishes on the mailing-list.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -bborie
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jayson Gallardo <
>>>>>>>>>>> jaysontrades at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, okay. Yeah you're right about it taking time. I wrote a
>>>>>>>>>>>> python script to generate the raster2pgsql call with the appropriate table
>>>>>>>>>>>> name, so I can just let it run while I do other things. I really appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>> your help on this. I googled your name and I see you're a pretty busy
>>>>>>>>>>>> person, so I'm glad you're taking the time to answer my questions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Bborie Park <
>>>>>>>>>>>> dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. I'm suggesting it later as it does take time and separates
>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations. Get everything imported first and then add constraints.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Having said that, you can do it all at once if so desired...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just preference depending on volume of import data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -bborie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Jayson Gallardo <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jaysontrades at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay, is there a specific reason why? As your link states: "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raster2pgsql loader uses this function to register raster
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tables". Are you saying I should specify constraints that will be similar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> across all tables?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bborie Park <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd suggest adding constraints after the fact through SQL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of letting raster2pgsql do it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.postgis.net/docs/manual-2.0/RT_AddRasterConstraints.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -bborie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jayson Gallardo <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jaysontrades at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So based on the link you provided, and what else I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gathered, I first create a parent table:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  CREATE TABLE dem_elevation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   rid integer NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   rast raster,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> );
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Then I run raster2pgsql on all the downloaded elevation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data, sending each input tile to its own table, ie. dem_elevation_n36w091.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then alter table to inherit from parent:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALTER TABLE dem_elevation_n36w091 INHERIT dem_elevation;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With raster2pgsql taking care of setting the constraints
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for each table. Now, I can just query the parent table dem_elevation to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what I need?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Bborie Park <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I use the USGS NED 10 meter for California with one table
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for each input raster. In the partitioned table scheme, data tables inherit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from a template (parent) table. Queries run on the parent table access the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inherited tables.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -bborie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Jayson Gallardo <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jaysontrades at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it's usgs ned. And I initially went with one table
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for each input tile, but I didn't know how to join (or union) them together
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for my query.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  On Jul 23, 2013 1:14 PM, "Bborie Park" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you describe your elevation dataset? Is it USGS NED?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At which resolution (10 meter, 3 meter?)?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for table partitioning...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/ddl-partitioning.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You'll probably partition spatially, though an easy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> solution is to have a table for each input raster file.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -bborie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Jayson Gallardo <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jaysontrades at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for responding. Could you outline how I would go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about doing a partitioned table structure? My only concern with tile size
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is processing time. Most of my queries will involve areas of less than 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mi^2, and I would clip the data into that shape. I just don't know where to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start! There's not too many resources online/print dealing with postgis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rasters in detail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Bborie Park <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You may not need to drop all the constraints when
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adding additional data to the table. You most likely will need to drop is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the maximum extent constraint. Assuming the input rasters have the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scale, skew and SRID as that found in the table, you don't need to drop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those corresponding constraints.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you're going to do the continental US at a fine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolution (e.g. 1 meter), you do NOT want to put all the rasters in one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> table. You'll want to use a partitioned table structure and should consider
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bigger tile size (depending on your hardware).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -bborie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Jayson Gallardo <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jaysontrades at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've looked and looked, but I have not been able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find an answer to my question. I have downloaded elevation data for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state of Arkansas (in the form of multiple tiles), and used raster2pgsql to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upload it into a single table:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raster2pgsql -I -C -e -F -t 50x50 -l 2,4 n*/grdn*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public.dem_elevation | psql -U postgres -d testdb -h localhost -p 5432
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did this because I didn't know how to pull the data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if they were in separate tables. Now, however I would like to add elevation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data for other areas. I tried to just add it to the current table, but that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> required dropping the constraints which for such a huge amount of data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems to take a long time (I let it run for 24+ hours and it didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finish). So, my question is, if I load all my rasters as individual tables,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how could I run something similar to this query on them all (from a python
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> script):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SELECT ST_AsGDALRaster(ST_CLIP(ST_Union(rast),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ST_GeomFromText(WKT,900913)),'GTiff') FROM "dem_elevation" WHERE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ST_Intersects(rast, ST_Transform(ST_GeomFromText(WKT,900913),4269))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My goal, if it's not obvious, is to clip elevation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data and export it to a GTiff format and perform some operations on that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raster data. Eventually, I would like to put the whole continental US
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elevation data into my database, so I need to be able to do so, while still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being able to query them based on an area of interest the user selects from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a map. I started working with PostGIS and Mapserver last month, so please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forgive my ignorance on such topics. Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> postgis-users mailing list
>>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-users mailing list
>> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-users mailing list
> postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20130730/8b72862b/attachment.html>


More information about the postgis-users mailing list