[postgis-users] Is PostGIS effectively LGPL?
lr at pcorp.us
Wed Dec 21 11:12:36 PST 2016
I wouldn't say essentially LGPL.
The thing is that when PostGIS is used, it is via linking or the psql and similar driver API. So e.g. PostgreSQL can exist without PostGIS and your software can call PostGIS functions without embedding PostGIS into it and alls stored functions are in source code anyway if you sell to a customer.
It falls under this exception:
Now if you were to take the source code of PostGIS and compile it into your own software, then your software I think would then be governed by the
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#IfLibraryIsGPL you describe.
Just my two cents,
From: postgis-users [mailto:postgis-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 1:29 PM
To: postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [postgis-users] Is PostGIS effectively LGPL?
I know PostGIS is GPL licensed. However, I thought the major difference between the GPL and the LGPL was that the LGPL didn't require applications that link with the LGPL software to honor the LGPL requirements.
Since PostGIS doesn't force applications that link to PostGIS to honor the GPL license, isn't PostGIS more like LGPL than GPL? Here is the linking exception in the PostGIS FAQ:
FYI, This differs from the Free Software Foundation's interpretation of the GPL linking/license-transfer requirement:
Bruce Momjian <bruce at momjian.us> http://momjian.us
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the postgis-users