[postgis-users] raster2pgsql: out_db=false with -F flag (And Showing out_db rasters in QGIS)
Michael.Haertel at t-systems.com
Michael.Haertel at t-systems.com
Tue May 2 02:37:39 PDT 2017
Dear users,
I hope that somebody can tell me if I found a bug or simply don't use the command correctly.
Given:
* A directory with four GeoTIFF files
* PostgreSQL 9.6.1, compiled by Visual C++ build 1800, 64-bit
* POSTGIS="2.3.1 r15264" GEOS="3.6.0-CAPI-1.10.0 r4265" SFCGAL="1.3.0" PROJ="Rel. 4.9.1, 04 March 2015" GDAL="GDAL 2.1.1, released 2016/07/07" LIBXML="2.7.8" LIBJSON="0.12" RASTER
* OS is Windows 7
I try to import the Tiff files as OUT_DB raster files using this command:
1. raster2pgsql.exe -s 25832 -I -R -n myFilename -C -M -F C:\_GEODATA_\*.tif raster2x2 > t:\DTK10.sql
Output:
a. Processing 1/4: C:\_GEODATA_\24_dtk10_32356_5608_2_nw_col.tif
b. Processing 2/4: C:\_GEODATA_\25_dtk10_32356_5610_2_nw_col.tif
c. Processing 3/4: C:\_GEODATA_\34_dtk10_32358_5608_2_nw_col.tif
d. Processing 4/4: C:\_GEODATA_\35_dtk10_32358_5610_2_nw_col.tif
2. psql.exe --host=localhost --port=5432 --username=xxx --dbname=xxx -f t:\DTK10.sql
Output:
a. BEGIN
b. CREATE TABLE
c. INSERT 0 1
d. INSERT 0 1
e. INSERT 0 1
f. INSERT 0 1
g. CREATE INDEX
h. ANALYZE
i. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding SRID constraint
j. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding scale-X constraint
k. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding scale-Y constraint
l. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding blocksize-X constraint
m. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding blocksize-Y constraint
n. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding alignment constraint
o. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding number of bands constraint
p. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding pixel type constraint
q. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding nodata value constraint
r. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding out-of-database constraint
s. psql:t:/DTK10.sql:9: HINWEIS: Adding maximum extent constraint
t. addrasterconstraints
u. ----------------------
v. t
Problem is that the view "raster_columns" always shows FALSE for out_db, even though I used the F flag:
"r_table_catalog" "r_table_schema" "r_table_name" "r_raster_column" "srid" "scale_x" "scale_y" "blocksize_x" "blocksize_y" "same_alignment" "regular_blocking" "num_bands" "pixel_types" "nodata_values" "out_db" "extent" "spatial_index"
"gismobile" "public" "raster2x2 " "rast" 25832 0.5 -0.5 4000 4000 true false 1 {8BUI} {NULL} {f} 0103000020E864000001000000050000000000000080BA154100000000906455410000000080BA154100000000786855410000000000F9154100000000786855410000000000F9154100000000906455410000000080BA15410000000090645541 true
"rid" "rast" "filename"
1 0100000100000000000000E03F000000000000E0BF0000000080BA1541000000008466554100000000000000000000000000000000E8640000A00FA00F840000433A5C5F47454F444154415F5C32345F64746B31305F33323335365F353630385F325F6E775F636F6C2E74696600 "24_dtk10_32356_5608_2_nw_col.tif"
2 0100000100000000000000E03F000000000000E0BF0000000080BA1541000000007868554100000000000000000000000000000000E8640000A00FA00F840000433A5C5F47454F444154415F5C32355F64746B31305F33323335365F353631305F325F6E775F636F6C2E74696600 "25_dtk10_32356_5610_2_nw_col.tif"
3 0100000100000000000000E03F000000000000E0BF00000000C0D91541000000008466554100000000000000000000000000000000E8640000A00FA00F840000433A5C5F47454F444154415F5C33345F64746B31305F33323335385F353630385F325F6E775F636F6C2E74696600 "34_dtk10_32358_5608_2_nw_col.tif"
4 0100000100000000000000E03F000000000000E0BF00000000C0D91541000000007868554100000000000000000000000000000000E8640000A00FA00F840000433A5C5F47454F444154415F5C33355F64746B31305F33323335385F353631305F325F6E775F636F6C2E74696600 "35_dtk10_32358_5610_2_nw_col.tif"
What I found out: As soon as I omit the s flag (to provide a SRS) the column shows TRUE.
I guess that this is not the intended behaviour is it?
My QGIS 2.18 only shows black boxes for out_db rasters, the rasters themselves (pixel values) only appear for "in-DB" rasters. Did anybody succeed in showing out_db rasters in QGIS?
Interestiung is also that gdalinfo is not showing any extents although it shows correct SRS and the "extent" column is populated (see above):
C:\_PortableApps_\pgsql\bin>"c:\QGIS\bin\gdalinfo.exe" PG:"dbname='xxx' host='localhost' port='5432' user='mhaerte2' password='xxx' table='raster2x2'"
Driver: PostGISRaster/PostGIS Raster driver
Files: none associated
Size is 0, 0
Coordinate System is:
PROJCS["ETRS89 / UTM zone 32N",
GEOGCS["ETRS89",
DATUM["European_Terrestrial_Reference_System_1989",
SPHEROID["GRS 1980",6378137,298.257222101,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]],
TOWGS84[0,0,0,0,0,0,0],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","6258"]],
PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","4258"]],
PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator"],
PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",0],
PARAMETER["central_meridian",9],
PARAMETER["scale_factor",0.9996],
PARAMETER["false_easting",500000],
PARAMETER["false_northing",0],
UNIT["metre",1,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","9001"]],
AXIS["Easting",EAST],
AXIS["Northing",NORTH],
AUTHORITY["EPSG","25832"]]
Subdatasets:
--- snip! --
Corner Coordinates:
Upper Left ( 0.0, 0.0)
Lower Left ( 0.0, 0.0)
Upper Right ( 0.0, 0.0)
Lower Right ( 0.0, 0.0)
Center ( 0.0, 0.0)
Does anyone have a clue?
Thank you for your comments,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20170502/45caff35/attachment.html>
More information about the postgis-users
mailing list