[postgis-users] ArcGIS desktop accessing and reading from PostGIS

[Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)]

Shao,

I had to dig fairly deeply into the ESRI site to find this particular explanation for why the service couldn’t/wouldn’t get connected.  Just to be clear, we do use logins for accessing the database, we just have chosen to use the “postgres” (named) database.

So, I just went and tried to find the refence I found previously, and can’t find it (real quick).  Anyway,as long as you don’t try to connect to the “postgres” database, things do seem to work ok.

bobb





On Aug 21, 2019, at 2:18 AM, Shaozhong SHI <shishaozhong at gmail.com<mailto:shishaozhong at gmail.com>> wrote:

Think Before You Click: This email originated outside our organization.

Hi, Bob,
Can you point me to excellent technical documentation on what you mentioned, so that I can double-check.
My colleagues have made it working, but there are some issues.  For instance, not all ArcGIS desktops can access and retrieve data.

Looking forward to have more insight into this matter.

Regards,

Shao

On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 17:08, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us<mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>> wrote:
All,

One biggie, is that the ESRI side does not like connecting to the “postgres” named database, claiming it’s a System database (whatever that means).  This is not readily available as a limitation either when looking for reasons why it won’t connect.  We’ve been using the “postgres” database name for years (a decade now??) with no ill effects from other applications/ connections.  I sort of understand this from the commercial side having worked with other databases like Oracle and MSSQL, but still, there should be a way to side step this with a setting somewhere.

I looked high and low for a way to alias the “postgres” database name inside of Postgres, but didn’t find anything very easy to implement or maintain very easily.  I did think about setting up another dataabase and using Views to the postgres database, but that seemed like a bad idea for some reason, along with being somewhat hard to maintain, but upon reflection I keep coming back to the idea.

All non “postgres” named connections seem to work fine so far.  Haven’t implemented anything yet that is really heavy duty as far as loading though, so who knows.

Anyway, just my 2cents.

bobb



On Aug 20, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Shaozhong SHI <shishaozhong at gmail.com<mailto:shishaozhong at gmail.com>> wrote:

Think Before You Click: This email originated outside our organization.

How to ensure that all versions of ArcGIS desktop applications can access and read from server-based PostGIS/PostgreSQL?

Regards,

Shao
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:postgis-users at lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-users/attachments/20190821/1c6f7693/attachment.html>