[OSRS-PROJ] On Proj4...

[Paul Selormey]

Hello Frank,
Thanks for the response.

> This is a mistake on my part.  I will submit a bug (149) to myself to come
up
> with another strod() implementation with appropriate license constraints
or
> to rewrite my own version.

What is the specification or the true behavior that the VC++ does not
satisfy?
This way, I could also try my hand at it since I am working on the codes
now.

> static double ceval( struct PW_COEF *C, int n);
>
> Apparently in K&R C untyped arguments were implicitly integers.

Thanks. In fact, I picked my K&R C in bits and pieces :-) I was not lucky
enough
to use it :(

> I understand your rationale but I don't think I will incorporate your
"expanded
> macros" version into the core, even though I too find the macros sometimes
> obscure what is going on from the casual developer.

It is not an expanded macro version, but a replacement. I was hoping it will
take over
but it can still run in parellel. It is just a beginning of my work on the
projection, I hope
to work further on this even as I study map projections.

Best regards,
Paul.


----------------------------------------
PROJ.4 Discussion List
See http://www.remotesensing.org/proj for subscription, unsubscription
and other information.