[Proj] Datum shifts in PROJ's EPSG table (The Netherlands and Belgium)

[Frank Warmerdam]

Jan Hartmann wrote:
> Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> 
>  > So when folks submit requests to use a particular datum shift for a
>  > given datum, I apply it via this override mechanism.
> 
> 
> In that case I would like to submit the Datum shifts for the Netherlands 
> and Belgium for inclusion in the epsg table. They are described in the 
> following postings:
> 
> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-users/2005-November/009894.html 
> 
> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-users/2006-October/013570.html 
> 
> 
> The Dutch parameters have been confirmed by the cadastral service; the 
> Belgian one has at least been tested once. See the thread starting with:
> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-users/2006-October/013565.html 

Jan,

Datum 4289 (Amersfoort) has already been incorporated for the PROJ 4.5.0
release.  Please submit a bugzilla bug report for the Belgium request with
any supporting information and I'll apply it.  (well ok, the change is already
in my local copy now - just waiting for a bug report # to reference).

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org