[Proj] Few danish PROJ definitions are missing

[Evan Haahr Hansen, LIFA A/S]

Hi all
We are about to implement the PROJ libraries in our applications but it seems that a few Danish PROJ definitions are missing:
DNN  - We know that code says that it is "historical" but when you work with old maps you still need it
System City Ring - near Copenhagen
FK89 (EPSG code 3173) - for the Faroe Islands

I also think that there is a small error in the PROJ definition for UTM29N_FVR09. In the last part of the definition there is a reference to FO:UTM32N. Shouldn't it be FO:UTM29N (which is defined in the line above) ?

Med venlig hilsen
Evan Haahr Hansen, LIFA A/S
Ingeniør

[http://website.lifa.dk/docs/LIFA_GIS·IT_logo.png]
T

6313 6800

@

eha at LIFA.DK

D

6313 6852

W

www.lifa.dk<http://www.lifa.dk>

M






Vi tilbyder interne og eksterne kurser. Du kan finde mere information i vores kursuskalender<https://www.lifa.dk/kursuskalender>

[cid:image002.png at 01D43079.16ED8D30]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/lifa-a-s/>
Følg os på LinkedIn og læs de seneste nyheder fra LIFA A/S Landinspektører

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20180810/59506b82/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8192 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20180810/59506b82/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1204 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20180810/59506b82/attachment-0001.png>