[PROJ] Motion: Accept RFC4 (PROJ JNI Overhaul)

Martin Desruisseaux martin.desruisseaux at geomatys.com
Wed Jul 17 07:59:05 PDT 2019

Le 17/07/2019 à 16:28, Howard Butler a écrit :
> We do not want to bless any bindings as official because this is likely to squash any innovation that might go on.

I think there is two parts:

 1. Defining an API in another language.
 2. Providing a binding between PROJ and that other API.

Current PROJ and GDAL bindings merged those two parts, basically
reflecting the PROJ/GDAL API in the other language. I agree that other
communities are in better position for defining an API in their
language. By keeping part #1 out of this RFC and hosting only part #2 on
the PROJ repository, I think the situation become more similar to
PostgreSQL project providing a JDBC driver, not an API for accessing


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20190717/aa1b9d14/attachment.html>

More information about the PROJ mailing list