[PROJ] The state of PROJ C++ 2020
Kurt Schwehr
schwehr at gmail.com
Thu May 7 12:09:23 PDT 2020
See also other projects' discussions on the topic.
e.g. https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc68_cplusplus11.html
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:10 AM Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic at xs4all.nl>
wrote:
> On 5/7/20 6:31 PM, Søren Holm wrote:
> > I do however not understand why the precision and future evolution
> readiness -
> > which are features in inself - is brough into a purely language oriented
> > question. I'm quite sure that using C or C++ without the stuff that
> makes it
> > slow can be just as precise as anything else.
>
> You should read this thread:
>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/2018-May/007799.html
>
> > Lastly I just want to say that I did not write these email to start a
> > discussion. It was a mere combination of:
> >
> > "Hey, thing thing is takes 10 times longer to compile, Why is that?"
> >
> > and
> >
> > "If my software projects compile time increased 10 fold I would see it
> as a
> > bug."
>
> Mailinglists are for discussions, issue trackers are for bugs.
>
> If you're concerned about the increased time it takes to build software,
> you haven't been building QGIS since before 3.x and you should stay away
> from it.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
> --
> GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
> Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
> _______________________________________________
> PROJ mailing list
> PROJ at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20200507/abce5e79/attachment.html>
More information about the PROJ
mailing list