[PROJ] Tie breakers used when ordering candidate operations

[Lesparre, Jochem]

Greg wrote:
> dragging in the UN and hence poltics

I agree with you that the use of an ensemble is by far the most problematic aspect of the label WGS84. However, if we try to teach people to use another label, we should use the opportunity to stress that WGS84(G1672) is the reference frame of just one of the GNSS in the world, owned by a specific country. Not the best, nor the worst. If you want to avoid politics, it is better to use a neutral reference frame. So use ITRF2014, not because the UN recommends it, but because it is the most neutral choice.

Kind regards, Jochem



Disclaimer:
De inhoud van dit bericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor geadresseerde.
Gebruik van de inhoud van dit bericht door anderen zonder toestemming van het Kadaster
is onrechtmatig. Mocht dit bericht ten onrechte bij u terecht komen, dan verzoeken wij u
dit direct te melden aan de verzender en het bericht te vernietigen.
Aan de inhoud van dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.

Disclaimer:
The content of this message is meant to be received by the addressee only.
Use of the content of this message by anyone other than the addressee without the consent
of the Kadaster is unlawful. If you have received this message, but are not the addressee,
please contact the sender immediately and destroy the message.
No rights can be derived from the content of this message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20210213/41e404a5/attachment.html>