[PROJ] PROJ 9.0.0RC1 & PROJ-data 1.9RC1

[Kristian Evers]

Sounds to me like there's a preference for Bas' idea.

Let's keep the incremented SONAME and move forward
using semantic versioning as Bas suggests.

Mike, can you do the necessary changes in the CMake setup?

/Kristian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Taves <mwtoews at gmail.com>
> Sent: 17. februar 2022 11:01
> To: Kristian Evers <kreve at sdfe.dk>
> Cc: Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic at xs4all.nl>; proj at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [PROJ] PROJ 9.0.0RC1 & PROJ-data 1.9RC1
> 
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 22:35, Kristian Evers via PROJ
> <proj at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the thorough explanation, Bas. It's much appreciated!
> >
> > Even, Mike: I haven't got strong opinions on this. Do you guys think it is
> > worth the hassle to switch to the model Bas describes here?
> 
> Thanks for the ideas Bas! I like it, as it's much simpler to see one
> incrementer.
> 
> If we decide to keep the incremented SONAME, then yes, let's implement
> a simpler versioning for PROJ 9.0RC2. But if we decide to keep the
> previous SONAME (due to no API/ABI break), then keep it libtool-style
> until the next API/ABI break.