[PROJ] PROJ (and GDAL) webpages

[Even Rouault]

> Wouldn't it be easier with a "tag" ? Just set (or re-set with -f) the 
> tag "stable" to the needed commit (that can be another tag, like "9.5.1")

Yes tagging the new commit in 9.5 as "stable" would be slightly quicker. 
But that *can't* be labelled as 9.5.1, because we issue such SemVer tags 
to match official releases (with a tarball etc).

I've finally successfully experimented some automation with a workflow 
that automatically refreshes the tag when a push is done in the 9.5 
branch. See https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/4323 and 
https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/4324. This adds 2 extra steps when 
creating a new maintenance branch, but apart from that, that should be 
transparent afterwards.

-- 

http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end, this is just about bytes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20241116/2243a11c/attachment-0001.htm>