[PROJ] EPSG release once more busted
SIMON Nicolas
nicolas.simon at spw.wallonie.be
Wed Jul 22 08:06:38 PDT 2026
Even,
Thank you for your checks.
What I wanted to share is the example of the modifications made by EPSG that led to corruption of the transformation data.
This raises questions about EPSG's validation process.
Nicolas
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
Envoyé : mercredi 22 juillet 2026 13:28
À : SIMON Nicolas <nicolas.simon at spw.wallonie.be>; proj at lists.osgeo.org
Objet : Re: [PROJ] EPSG release once more busted
Nicolas,
> were based on geocs 4258, and EPSG proposed a new mix of
> transformations
> BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2002] (1) (EPSG:1652) based on geocs 11063
> BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2002] (2) (EPSG:15928) based on geocs 11063
> BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2011] (3) (EPSG:8369) based on geocs 11215
I've just verified that the 12.059a update has reverted them back to using EPSG:4258 ETRS89.
can also be checked at:
- https://epsg.org/transformation_1652/BD72-to-ETRS89-1.html
- https://epsg.org/transformation_15928/BD72-to-ETRS89-2.html
- https://epsg.org/transformation_8369/BD72-to-ETRS89-3.html
Even
--
http://www.spatialys.com/
My software is free, but my time generally not.
LLMs contribute to global warming and brain rot.
More information about the PROJ
mailing list