[PROJ] EPSG release once more busted

[support at mnspoint.com]

It's no wonder there are problems with EPSG if it's just as full of 
idiots as the PROJ crew... All the best! :D

Janne

------------------------------------------------------
On 2026-07-22 18:06, SIMON Nicolas via PROJ wrote:
> Even,
> 
> Thank you  for your checks.
> What I wanted to share is the example of the modifications made by EPSG 
> that led to corruption of the transformation data.
> This raises questions about EPSG's validation process.
> 
> Nicolas
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
> Envoyé : mercredi 22 juillet 2026 13:28
> À : SIMON Nicolas <nicolas.simon at spw.wallonie.be>; proj at lists.osgeo.org
> Objet : Re: [PROJ] EPSG release once more busted
> 
> Nicolas,
> 
>> were based on geocs 4258, and EPSG proposed a new mix of
>> transformations
>> BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2002] (1) (EPSG:1652) based on geocs 11063
>> BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2002] (2) (EPSG:15928) based on geocs 11063
>> BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2011] (3) (EPSG:8369) based on geocs 11215
> 
> I've just verified that the 12.059a update has reverted them back to 
> using EPSG:4258 ETRS89.
> 
> can also be checked at:
> - https://epsg.org/transformation_1652/BD72-to-ETRS89-1.html
> - https://epsg.org/transformation_15928/BD72-to-ETRS89-2.html
> - https://epsg.org/transformation_8369/BD72-to-ETRS89-3.html
> 
> Even
> 
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com/
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
> LLMs contribute to global warming and brain rot.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PROJ mailing list
> PROJ at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj