[PROJ] Fwd: LLM/AI tool policy

[Thomas Knudsen]

I have spent a few minutes trying very hard to disagree with the contents
of the GDAL AI tool policy. Unfortunately (and much to my regret  🙂), I
did not find a single word, letter, whitespace character, or punctuation
mark worth disagreeing with.

I would, however, suggest modifying Even's suggestion of "s/GDAL/PROJ/" to
the only slightly more verbose "s/GDAL/PROJ/g" 🙂

/Thomas


Den tors. 12. mar. 2026 kl. 17.38 skrev Even Rouault via PROJ <
proj at lists.osgeo.org>:

> (resending due to yesterday's OSGeo server maintenance)
>
> -------- Message transféré --------
> Sujet : LLM/AI tool policy
> Date : Wed, 11 Mar 2026 23:03:39 +0100
> De : Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
> <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
> Pour : proj <proj at lists.osgeo.org> <proj at lists.osgeo.org>
>
> Folks,
>
> after GDAL and QGIS, I strongly suspect we also now receive LLM driven
> contributions. What about adopting
> https://gdal.org/en/stable/community/ai_tool_policy.html with s/GDAL/PROJ
> ?
>
> Even
>
> -- http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PROJ mailing list
> PROJ at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20260312/04c6d9d3/attachment.htm>