[PROJ] Fwd: LLM/AI tool policy
Javier Jimenez Shaw
j1 at jimenezshaw.com
Thu Mar 12 13:00:39 PDT 2026
As a first step I find it ok. Let's see if it is enough.
On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 at 18:14, Thomas Knudsen via PROJ <proj at lists.osgeo.org>
wrote:
> I have spent a few minutes trying very hard to disagree with the contents
> of the GDAL AI tool policy. Unfortunately (and much to my regret 🙂), I
> did not find a single word, letter, whitespace character, or punctuation
> mark worth disagreeing with.
>
> I would, however, suggest modifying Even's suggestion of "s/GDAL/PROJ/" to
> the only slightly more verbose "s/GDAL/PROJ/g" 🙂
>
> /Thomas
>
>
> Den tors. 12. mar. 2026 kl. 17.38 skrev Even Rouault via PROJ <
> proj at lists.osgeo.org>:
>
>> (resending due to yesterday's OSGeo server maintenance)
>>
>> -------- Message transféré --------
>> Sujet : LLM/AI tool policy
>> Date : Wed, 11 Mar 2026 23:03:39 +0100
>> De : Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
>> <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
>> Pour : proj <proj at lists.osgeo.org> <proj at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> after GDAL and QGIS, I strongly suspect we also now receive LLM driven
>> contributions. What about adopting
>> https://gdal.org/en/stable/community/ai_tool_policy.html with
>> s/GDAL/PROJ ?
>>
>> Even
>>
>> -- http://www.spatialys.com
>> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PROJ mailing list
>> PROJ at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
>>
> _______________________________________________
> PROJ mailing list
> PROJ at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20260312/682fc7fd/attachment.htm>
More information about the PROJ
mailing list