[pycsw-devel] new website development

Tom Kralidis tomkralidis at hotmail.com
Mon Aug 26 03:51:56 PDT 2013


Ryan: great work here. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 2013-08-25, at 9:28, "Angelos Tzotsos" <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ryan,
> 
> Having seen your initial work on http://rclark.github.io/pycsw.org/ I am starting to get convinced about the Jekyll + Markdown combo.
> 
> As long as pycsw documentation stays in Python world (i.e. rst) I am +1 on moving the web site to Jekyll.
> 
> This does not mean I did not like the prototype made by Tom.
> 
> One more comment: the main pycsw.org web site must remain at OSGeo infrastructure in my opinion (we are under incubation), so GitHub can definitely hold your development version before deploying to OSGeo servers.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Best,
> Angelos
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Ryan Clark <ryan.clark at azgs.az.gov> wrote:
>> I would say the big benefit to GitHub pages is that they provide your server hosting. Maybe that's not an issue. I think there's also a nice simplicity in keeping the website / documentation code literally in the same repository as the code itself -- just on a separate branch. Again, that may or may not be an issue.
>> 
>> Either way, I'd like to try and help with the website / templating / design. Have you already started some of this work in a separate repository?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> ____________________
>> 
>> Ryan Clark
>> Arizona Geological Survey
>> ryan.clark at azgs.az.gov
>> (520) 302-4871
>> facebook.com/ModernGeologist
>> @worbly
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 23, 2013, at 7:03 AM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Looks like it. Since the existing content is rST, I thought that would be easier. Are there advantages to using Jekyll + GitHub pages? I'm still in the template/design stage, so there's time to change engines.
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: ryan.clark at azgs.az.gov 
>>>> To: gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com 
>>>> CC: tomkralidis at hotmail.com; pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org 
>>>> Subject: Re: [pycsw-devel] new website development 
>>>> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:53:05 +0000 
>>>> 
>>>> This kind of documentation would be a great target for Jekyll + GitHub  
>>>> pages. I guess you would have to use markdown though? 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 23, 2013, at 2:38 AM, "Angelos Tzotsos"  
>>>> <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com<mailto:gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com>> wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Tom, 
>>>> 
>>>> This is a very good idea for all the reasons you mentioned. 
>>>> +1 
>>>> 
>>>> BTW, I am preparing an HTML5 presentation for FOSS4G 2013 and I am  
>>>> wondering where this would live and be maintained. 
>>>> 
>>>> If the web-site code lives in a new git repository, then I guess it  
>>>> would be natural to add resources there, right? 
>>>> 
>>>> Best, 
>>>> Angelos 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Tom Kralidis  
>>>> <tomkralidis at hotmail.com<mailto:tomkralidis at hotmail.com>> wrote: 
>>>> Hi all, 
>>>> 
>>>> The Sphinx documentation in [1] powers the pycsw.org<http://pycsw.org>  
>>>> website and associated documentation. 
>>>> 
>>>> Sphinx docs were initially setup to manage both to make things easy,  
>>>> however given project maturation, our OSGeo incubation process, I think  
>>>> it's a good time to decouple the website content from pure software  
>>>> documentation and manage them separately.  Rationale/benefits: 
>>>> 
>>>> - web content is growing (OSGeo incubation will soon lead us to  
>>>> PSC/RFC's and so on, community, FAQ) 
>>>> - website is due for a nice redesign (the docs don't need as much flare) 
>>>> - website announcements are natural for a blog setup 
>>>> - the website's lifecycle shouldn't/won't have to move along with  
>>>> software release 
>>>> 
>>>> I've opened a ticket for this [2]. 
>>>> 
>>>> Comments? Ideas? Objections? 
>>>> 
>>>> It would be great to have some help especially in the website/template  
>>>> design, so if anyone has a flare for web design/UI, any contributions  
>>>> are more than welcome. 
>>>> 
>>>> I'm initially thinking for the design to be implemented using Bootstrap  
>>>> [3], and setup using Pelican [4] (n.b. we don't have to redo the web  
>>>> content which is already in rST). 
>>>> 
>>>> ..Tom 
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/tree/master/docs 
>>>> [2] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/issues/180 
>>>> [3] http://getbootstrap.com 
>>>> [4] http://docs.getpelican.com 
>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>> pycsw-devel mailing list 
>>>> pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org> 
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pycsw-devel 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --  
>>>> Angelos Tzotsos 
>>>> Remote Sensing Laboratory 
>>>> National Technical University of Athens 
>>>> http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos 
>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>> pycsw-devel mailing list 
>>>> pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:pycsw-devel at lists.osgeo.org> 
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pycsw-devel   
>>>>  
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Angelos Tzotsos
> Remote Sensing Laboratory
> National Technical University of Athens
> http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pycsw-devel/attachments/20130826/cd7df2ba/attachment.html>


More information about the pycsw-devel mailing list